Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross-Harbour Bus Route 606

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of bus routes in Hong Kong#Eastern Harbour Crossing. Nobody thinks this is notable, but opinion is split for delete vs. redirect. I'm going with redirect per WP:ATD. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-Harbour Bus Route 606

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of a thousand bus routes in Hong Kong. Not really notable, has no substantial history (created 1989). Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur with nom. Bus routes are rarely notable. Nothing unusual about this one noted. MB 15:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of bus routes in Hong Kong#Eastern Harbour Crossing (with the history preserved under the redirect), where the bus route is already mentioned, in lieu of deletion. I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject.
I support preserving the history under the redirect so the content can be reused for a merge to articles like List of bus routes in Hong Kong or so the redirect can be easily undone if editors find significant coverage about the subject.
Cunard (talk) 06:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per above. I would not expect any bus routes to be notable, unless maybe the first route ever or some other historical relevance. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Bus routes are generally non-notable, and this article has zero sources. As a second choice, redirect per Cunard. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.