Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crombie REIT

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 23:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crombie REIT[edit]

Crombie REIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. Does not meet WP:NCORP since sources are largely WP:ROUTINE coverage. Sawada Katsuo (talk) 06:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 07:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator has been blocked for spamming. I am not closing this nomination so that it can be evaluated on its merits (or lack thereof) - just because they are a spammer doesn't mean they're wrong. MER-C 17:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A company that is a component of a stock market index such as the S&P/TSX Composite Index can be expected to be notable. As well, there are several good references in the article. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 21:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not automatically, see WP:LISTED. We need references, I've check for analyst reports but the first quick check hasn't turned up anything although it is "covered" by analysts. HighKing++ 16:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: HighKing's concerns have not been addressed by participants
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 23:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.