Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critters USA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critters USA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable magazine. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced and fails to demonstrate notability. It's a real magazine and it might even be notable. However it's the article creator's responsibility to demonstrate this, and they haven't done so here. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This may be non-notable, but it's the nominator's responsibility, per WP:BEFORE, to make a good-faith search for sources before nominating at AfD, and in good faith, I assume you did so. My cursory search on Google News turned up some reliable sources (there's a Dallas Morning News article, for one), but I'm not taking the time to see if their coverage is in-depth. Could you explain why those sources are inadequate? - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 17:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.