Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Pakistan Armed Forces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. qedk (t 桜 c) 06:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Pakistan Armed Forces[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was started as "The Establishment" and can be restored as such. ~~Some of the old text has been deleted randomly and new content is in its old form.~~ DTM (talk) 10:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Establishment (Pakistan) - this needs to be shifted to the mainspace under the same name and not "Criticism of Pakistan Armed Forces" since there is a content mismatch. DTM (talk) 10:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity I should add, there is nearly a 100% content overlap between the article and the draft. A simple line to line scan clears this out, other than the DupDetector. Even if the scope of Criticism of Pakistan Armed Forces can exist separately, currently it has ZERO content and should be deleted, merged, redirected until someone adds content and gets rid of the overlap between the two articles. DTM (talk) 10:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but improve. Störm (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete this being an ATTACK page. 39.50.217.44 (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Involved in socking. Störm (talk) 05:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both Criticism of Pakistan Armed Forces and The Establishment (Pakistan). The Establishment had lots of important content and is of a wider scope while criticism of armed forces is also warranted because Pakistani armed forces are unique in the world that they control everything in Pakistan unlike the rest of the world. Both subjects easily meets WP:GNG. NavjotSR (talk) 13:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both per reasons provided above. At first I thought this might be a title dispute but above comments clears it up accurately that what we should do. Aman Kumar Goel^(Talk) 19:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I fail to understand the point of this AfD. On what basis is the nom asking for deletion? This article has a much wider scope than "The Establisment". It covers Pak Army's human rights violations in Balochistan, war crimes in Bangladesh, etc. and not just its interference in the non-military affairs of Pakistan. Bharatiya29 15:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.