Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Olariu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cristian Olariu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable, secondary coverage providing significant coverage of this assistant professor. There are a few papers, but nothing that would suggest his work is cited enough for WP:ACADEMIC, nor do the other ACADEMIC/PROF notability guidelines seem to be met. A separate search for sources turned up a few references, but nothing both reliable, secondary and providing significant coverage. Unsourced BLP for 2 years, I did add a primary reference to his site at the University. Additional sources welcome, of course! joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self-promotional, unencyclopedic. Dahn (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is nothing more than this person's CV – there isn't even a meaningful claim of notability. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete AP at a university that is not worldwide notable. Nergaal (talk) 20:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. We've already deleted Olarius with more plausible claims of academic notability, from the same set of articles. They didn't meet our standards, and this one is even less close. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt for repeated recreation, Essentially a copy and paste of a CV. No indication of passing WP:PROF RadioFan (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.