Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis or Transformation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crisis or Transformation[edit]

Crisis or Transformation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-encyclopedic essay. My be a copyvio of Human Systems Management: Integrating Knowledge, Management & Systems., but I can't locate the book through digital means to check. Ishdarian 12:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 07:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The book exists, Google Books has a bio/bibliotex page bu no sample pages,etc. I think this is whole CopyVio page, but can't prove it. It reads like WP:OR at the moment, with a single source, which is also suspect as it's about Etruscan architecture, which may be linked into the article context somehow, but may not be linked. It doesn't have much in the way of entry context. It looks as though it's been copied from the book, with entry/exit summaries between paragraph's to link each logical section. The author has another article, which reads similarly, but has a raft of sources, and decent initial context. However, this is a young article and it may be updated in the future scope_creep talk 17:25, 06 October 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.