Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricket Gaming Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Gaming Awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game awards issued by a non-notable website. I cannot find find significant coverage in reliable sources, or anything else to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (web). Contested PROD; only sources added were press releases. Glenfarclas (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage found. --Teancum (talk) 13:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are available via Google for this event. Since this was a first event and also for a very small niche hence the sources are not many, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitterman (talk • contribs) 14:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references and external links cited in the article are all sources from the Cricket Gaming Awards (either directly or via press releases), except possibly a blog post at www.sticksports.com. Saying "sources are available via Google" is not very helpful: if you have found reliable sources then why not give us specific links to them? I have looked on Google and found no significant sources at all: of those pages I found, the majority give brief verbatim quotes from Cricket Gaming Awards press releases, and that is all. Not a single one was a reliable independent source, and scarcely any of them gave significant coverage either. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources found in magazines either. --Bejnar (talk) 03:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.