Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crespin Adanguidi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crespin Adanguidi[edit]
- Crespin Adanguidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:PERP. simply being a murderer is not enough to justify an article. LibStar (talk) 04:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteDon't see where this subject is anything more than a passing news story; not enough outside of the standard news cycle to get past the WP:NOTNEWS issue; something showing lasting historical importance such as books about him, or discussions outside of news reports of his crime and/or trial would be helpful, but as it stands now, I don't see where this subject merits an article. --Jayron32 05:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like a run-of-the-mill criminal; no sign of any notability as the only major coverage is from news sources at the time of the crimes. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.