Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creepers (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creepers (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOKS. Sp33dyphil © • © 06:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are several independent reviews available [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Also the book was awarded the Bram Stoker Award for Best Novel in 2005 [8], and here [9] it is used as a case study on, well, promoting a book through blogs and websites. These are only mentions [10] [11] [12] [13], but they help show the book's impact — frankie (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Descriptive and legnthy, informes you of the entire story, it needs citations and wikification, User:Frankie has provided a list of potential references for us, this is 100% salvagable. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent refs from Frankie. --GRuban (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google news archive search for the title of the book and the name of the author, and you instantly find results. "Creepers" "David Morrell" [14] says "a New York Times and Los Angeles Times bestseller which earned the celebrated Bram Stoker Award for Best Novel of 2005". Since others have already found and mentioned ample coverage, no need for me to go through the rest. Dream Focus 16:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Frankie. Unquestionably meets notability requirements. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.