Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit Clear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Credit Clear

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Credit Clear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Generic. scope_creep^Talk 13:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

• Inclined to delete per nom and per WP:PROMO (I truly hate seeing articles about business "solutions") but I have a question. Per [1], it looks like it is about to be WP:LISTED on the Australian Securities Exchange in a matter of days—the roadshow is happening as we speak. What are people's thoughts about how to weigh WP:TOOSOON and WP:LISTED in this context? AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

• "Keep" Recent reports suggest that the company will soon be listed. While WP:Listed doesn't exactly mean automatic notability it most certainly means that an organization is inherently notable. Given the company is already in the process, I think it is kind of redundant deleting it right now and recreating it in a few month's time. Yaywoh (talk) 06:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Listing isn't a thing here. What is salient, is WP:NCORP and whether or the not the article references satisfy the specific aspects of that policy. Business listing, share announcements, director announcements, changes in share prices, funding news, money raised and so on, cant be used to verify notability. scope_creep^Talk 09:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

• Comment All reference as far as I can see are press-releases in one form or another. I guess I'll go through the references. scope_creep^Talk 11:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
• Comment Review of References

1. [2] Chairman taken on. simple listings or compilations, such as: of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders Fails WP:CORPDEPTH
2. [3] standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as {[tq|of a capital transaction, such as raised capital}} Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and is a press-release.
3. Similar to 2.
4. [[4] of a capital transaction, such as raised capital Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
5. Same reference as 4. An announcement. Fails standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
6. Raising 8.5 million. of a capital transaction, such as raised capital Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
7. Chairman announcement. simple listings or compilations, such as: of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders Fails WP:CORPDEPTH
8. Press-release
9. Raised 9million. of a capital transaction, such as raised capital Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.

The rest of the references are the same. They fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. They are all press-releases. scope_creep^Talk 08:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

• Delete No indications of notability. Nick-D (talk) 22:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.