Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creators, sustainers, and destroyers in white nationalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creators, sustainers, and destroyers in white nationalism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic is currently sourced only to primary sources. Even the SPLC source only quotes Pierce's essay on the subject. Whilst there are plenty of discussions of Pierce's ideas in reliable sources, this particular one doesn't seem to have been taken up by anyone. I would suggest a merge to Pierce's article, but there's really nothing here to merge. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 12:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Into some white power/ Ku Klux Klan article. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not an encyclopedic topic. Polemic essay. Carrite (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An encyclopedia is not an essay-hosting service. Unless it can be shown that the essay/belief.whatever is itself notable, there's no place for this here. Tarc (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no in depth references MarioNovi (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete One-off wacko remark seized upon by the SPLC but apparently not cared about by anyone else out there. Mangoe (talk) 13:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.