Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Filest (aktl) 09:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creative development[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be entirely WP:OR. YixilTesiphon ^Talk_Contribs 15:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as OR. andy (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research, and meaningless: It's about creating yourself. Or re-inventing yourself. Becoming one of your best ideas. Turning the design process on yourself. A person who needs to create, goes through their own incubation phase. Then hopefully, emerges with a new idea about whole they are and their role. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Perhaps it could be rewritten as a non-marketing, encyclopedic piece. As it is, it is a mess on so many levels, that I am not sure much could be salvaged. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not really sure how that would be different from, say Creativity. Perhaps this should be a redirect. --YixilTesiphon ^Talk_Contribs 19:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.