Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Noise (Hillsong album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Noise (Hillsong album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the AllMusic reference nothing supports the notability of the album. See WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of independent significant coverage. WWGB (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On 19 June 2014 the nominator PRODed some 50+ Hillsong-related articles see here. From 21 June I noticed this list and that some 10+ of these PRODs were charting albums at either ARIA or Billboard. I have gone through more of the 50+ list and added sources where possible and dePRODed any that I felt had a reliable source for their existence. I was hoping to get time to supply further sources to attempt to establish notability. With so many articles to research this is not necessarily achievable in a short time-frame. The nominator has sent most of the dePRODed articles straight to AfD. I ask for time/assistance in actually searching for sources to support the articles' notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficient notability to be reviewed by reliable sources. Thanks to 3family6 for additional refs.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Can't people do a g-hits search? I brought up two different reviews for this: Christian Post and AllMusic. I agree with Shaidar cuebiyar that many (not all) of these PRODs were premature.--¿3family6 _contribs 19:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Many of the articles have already been deleted. The de-proding was premature on at least half of them. I agree that some were too early though. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 01:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.