Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Candies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Candies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and has been labeled with multiple issues since last month, I’m not sure if they were fixed if this article would be worthy enough to save, if deletion is the best option for it, or a third option of WP:BLOWITUP and start the article again from scratch. Pahiy (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Not seeing reliable sources to salvage this, but maybe the are in Chinese? Which I don't speak/read. Ping me if good sources are found, and remember than non-English sources are totally fine (just someone needs to find them...). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While collaboration with little children on animation is a good thing, it is difficult to see how this is noteworthy. My sense is this a case of WP:TOOSOON and when the right time comes, a topical article is the place for something like this. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Maybe there are sources in other languages, but there appears to be a complete and total lack of coverage upon a WP:BEFORE test. I was only able to find results for unrelated information. Dark knight 2149 17:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.