Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Butch Gang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r - TP 03:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Crazy Butch Gang[edit]
- Crazy Butch Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Falls into the WP:Notability crime section Cox wasan (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sufficient references to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep — it's the same argument as all the others. this is a notable subject because it's covered by multiple reliable sources, which are listed in the actual article. yes, there are no inline citations, but they are not required. this feels like a huge waste of time. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Per available reliable sources that establish notability of the topic Northamerica1000 (talk) 03:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The references in the article already establish notability. If you click on Google book search, you can look through those results and find additional ones if you want, but two is all you need. Dream Focus 04:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - established notability trough references.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.