Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crawford's charge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crawford's charge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An attack by a single division does not seem notable enough to have its own article. This could be covered just as well at Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. Wild Wolf (talk) 15:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. See my remarks about Anderson's assault, above. Hal Jespersen (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. Ma®©usBritish ^[chat] 19:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep The topic is notable, being covered in numerous sources. The way in which the complex and extensively documented Battle of Gettysburg is structured for presentation here is a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion and the nominator should please discuss that at the relevant pages for the battle. Please see WP:BEFORE. Warden (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the issue here is not if it can be referenced but if this is notable enough to have a seperete article from the Gettysburg article, which I believe is what Hal Jespersen is saying as well. Neither one of us believes that the battle needs to be covered in this much detail. (See the discussion on the MILHIST talk page here.) Wild Wolf (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per my comment above -- more context provided if part of the Second Day article. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Keep For all the notability and other keep reasons above for Anderson's assault. Target for Today (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. Mad Man American (talk) 15:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. 76.7.231.130 (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day (as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anderson's assault) I'm not seeing that this article expands sufficiently on the existing subsection in that article. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Battle of Gettysburg, Second Day. See my comment for Anderson's assault above. 67.239.100.244 (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.