Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crashlytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crashlytics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree - keep article - subject of article has many reliable third party sources. This article should be kept. Zackattackk (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please offer examples? Presently, it has been subject to six news articles, 5 of which are just reprints. That leaves two non-duplicate references. One of the two references just discusses the organization's founder, and only briefly mentions the company. The five reprints just mention that the company raised one million dollars to work on an app for Apple iOS. It is a five person company founded in early 2011. Presently, they don't meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 01:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete insufficient independent proof of notability. Locador (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.