Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cranbourne-Frankston Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cranbourne-Frankston Road[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this road is notable. Numbered routes are generally encyclopedic topics, but not every section is independently notable. Article contains no sources. Kinu ^t/_c 06:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Precedent already exists for inclusion, for example, refer to: List of roads and highways. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; does not appear to be notable. That a small proportion of other roads have articles does not justify keeping this one; it's totally unsourced and seems to be non-notable. bobrayner (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.