Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig gang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted. ttonyb (talk) 04:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Craig gang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not conform to Speedy Deletion standards (at least my understanding of them). Other than that, this is a non notable, non referenced group that has almost 0 hits from searches. Although most hits are from a South Park episode about the character Craig. Bluefist ^talk 03:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete wow I would have speedied this ASAP. It is nothing but a crass gathering of nonsense. Nothing notable at all. Golgofrinchian (talk) 03:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Looks like WP:CSD#G10 applies. I've boldly added that tag to the article page, if someone disagrees with the CSD, we can always conclude here. Probably would have been best to WP:PROD the article first as well. Looking at the article more closely, it alleges illegal activity, but it's mostly just nonsense (G1), lacking in context (A1), or fails to indicate importance (A7). SDY (talk) 03:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I knew there was something I forgot in between CSD and AfD. Bluefist ^talk 03:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as per previous comments and the fact that this article is completely unsourced and non-MOS. Also sounds like non-NPOV.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.