Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Slaight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Slaight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG John from Idegon (talk) 16:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Slaight is a leader and world renowkned innovator of theater for the young. He has worked with a number of countries in developing new works and cultural exchanges that have significantly changed the face of youth theater programs. His "New Plays" book series, featuring works from some of the world's top playwrights including a Pulitzer Prize winner, has provided a treasure trove of new work that specifically addresses the voice of the young. These works offer school programs relevant and age specific works that speak to issues young people experience and do so with a voice that they can relate to.[CJ] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.89.17 (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To the IP editor: All that is very nice but do you have either an opinion as to whether this article should be kept or deleted; and do you have any relevant arguments? Please read the guidelines referenced at the top of the edit window before replying. John from Idegon (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete multiple issues. I'm not seeing anything on the page that indicates anything with WP:GNG. Also article is written as if it's self-promotional material WP:PROMOTION. Quick search myself didn't turn up anything either. --MikeMan67 (talk) 09:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.