Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Kallman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdann52 (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Kallman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Giant block of unsourced promotional text. Subject may be notable, but I didn't feel there was enough salvageable content to justify re-writing it to WP:NOT advert standards CorporateM (Talk) 01:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and radically trim to a referenced stub that can be rewritten from the neutral point of view. This is the proper approach to dealing with promotional articles on notable topics. Deletion isn't appropriate in this case. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject does appear to be notable by most definitions. The text within the article was a copy-paste and I've taken the liberty of removing it. Please refer to the Wiki page history to see the removed content. Question: Should revisions be removed from the page history if they are copyright violations? AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 03:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.