Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowboy Caleb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptr e ^(Talk) 04:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Caleb

Half the text which is in this article should actually be in The Cowboy Bar. However, even if we leave out this information, what's left behind is nothing more than a non-notable guy...there are so many people that run moderately popular blogs. Also, this article reads like an advertisement.Soothing R 16:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --BorgQueen 16:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Latinus 19:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Think nom has it right. We don't even know the guy's real name, and blogging in itself is not the most encyclopedic of things. -R. fiend 20:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into The Cowboy Bar and delete. Main problem is the advertisement language. If someone can clean it up - then keep. --Vsion 20:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable blogger. *drew 23:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable blogger. I've never heard of him before. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 05:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge per Vsion's suggestion. __earth ^(Talk) 16:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Singopo 15:26, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 18:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.