Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coutts Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Coutts Bank

The result was The article was draftified (see Draft:Coutts–Nigel Farage controversy) by the original creator and the redirect at this title has been restored, so there's nothing more to do here. (non-admin closure)‎ Iffy★Chat -- 19:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an inappropriate split of a small amount of content that is better covered in the main article so the original redirect should be restored. If someone wants to split some of the revisions to a draft to improve later I think that should be OK though" 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:95E2:A362:5B6B:9B86 (talk) 14:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have completed this AfD for the IP above. This article (a split from Coutts and NatWest Group) was created as a result of a different IP editing the pre-existing redirect at Coutts Bank. If this AfD keeps the content as a separate page, the RM running concurrently (at Talk:Coutts Bank will decide where to move this page to and the current title should be restored as a redirect to Coutts. Iffy★Chat -- 15:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Restore the redirect to Coutts. It is too soon to know if this event will have any lasting significance beyond the event itself, and it has not received the depth of coverage required by WP:NEVENT. There are plenty of news stories reporting on various aspects of this story, but nothing I can find which indicates widespread impact or lasting significance. I also think this is an inappropriate WP:POVFORK of material that could easily be covered at Coutts. WJ94 (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Coutts it is the same topic, Coutts is about the bank, and is the WP:COMMONNAME CT55555(talk) 16:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirect and move article to Coutts-Nigel Farage controversy 90.255.19.247 (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:95E2:A362:5B6B:9B86 @2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD if you withdraw the AFD, I wouldn't mind the article being moved to draftspace, and the redirect being restored. 90.255.19.247 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore the redirect to Coutts per WJ94 and CT55555 above. The article is a paragraph of text copied from Coutts, as noted by creator in their attribution. Copy the same paragraph to a new draft, and put it through WP:AFC like any other non−confirmed editor. 2A00:23EE:16A8:C58:6836:22FF:FE30:62BD (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Finance, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore the redirect to Coutts. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 18:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.