Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Millslagle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney Millslagle[edit]

Courtney Millslagle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biography of a non-notable person. There are no real claims to notability - only that Millslagle was one of the dancers on a TV show (but the personal blog used as a reference for this claim does not currently even mention Millslagle) and that she was an audience member chosen to appear in a skit on another TV show. Deli nk (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete When an article mentions that the subject appeared in a skit on a variety show (chosen at random from the audience no less) we are dealing with a truly non-notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I didn't have time to comment on new page patrolling when it came around recently. However, my recollection of events related to not only this article but the attempted article on her sister (Draft:Penny Wojtacha, deleted out of process about eight months ago) is yet another reminder of why AFC, NPP and related processes have been an abject failure to this point, favoring blatant COI/SPA spam such as this. I don't know what's worse, the creator's claim that this article "will be a popular search" and an enhancement to the encyclopedia, or the lack of due diligence on the community's part following the initial hoop-jumping after its creation, leading to another time-wasting AFD. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete and permanently please. Read it, go ahead. This is as close to nonsense as I've seen in a page that purports to be about somebody. The page alleges she danced once on a TV show and was an audience participant in another. Come on, folks! This person is about as common as one can get and we are not a webhost. The closing admin should also consider blocking the creator of this horror. Bearian (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, speedy deletion has been declined twice by two different admins. Feel free to {{trout}} them. Deli nk (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.