Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtin number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Courtin number

Non-notable number. Probably a hoax. A Google search shows up only wiki mirror sites. Salih (talk) 06:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Possible~~ Hoax. The formula as given does not give a dimensionless number. The units are l/m^5. The talk page gives a name of a researcher "Lenard Kirk" from the "dept of ERG". Said researcher is asking for data to validate this formula. Therefore this is OR. Additionally I can't find any ghits other than obitiaries for Lenard Kirk. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just as I saved the above, I realised that this article is actually about sexual intercourse. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is it? I guess I can pull a few vague innuendoes out of it but I'm not too sure. ~ mazca ^t|c 09:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no idea if it's a hoax or not, and don't care. Absolutely no citations = assumption that someone made it up in class one day. Burden of proof, particularly for empirical information such as mathematics, is on the article writer. -Markeer 11:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't find any information on this to suggest it's notable, or indeed real. As Markeer suggests, WP:V really does require sources for this kind of thing and I can't see any. ~ mazca ^t|c 09:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm not sure it's about sex, as Beeswaxcandle claims, but the talk page entry looks quite socklike, and the calculation certainly doesn't give a dimensionless result. I think it's a hoax. AlexTiefling (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable. This seems to be about Taylor-Couette flow. Dimensionless numbers in this situation include the Reynolds number and the Ekman number, but I can't find evidence for the proposed Courtin number. However, I do think it's dimensionless: the unit of $C={\frac {\tau }{{\omega ^{2}}{D_{i}^{5}}{\rho }}}$ is ${\frac {[Nm]}{[s^{-1}]^{2}\,[m]^{5}\,[kg\,m^{-3}]}}={\frac {[kg\,m^{2}\,s^{-2}]}{[s^{-2}]\,[m^{5}]\,[kg\,m^{-3}]}}$ which is unitless. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.