Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 492 (Marquette County, Michigan)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Bad faith nomination, user is trying to make a point. Speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 23:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

County Road 492 (Marquette County, Michigan)

Not notable county road. Recommend Deletion. Gamweb (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose. This article is well-sourced and has historical value. Nominator is trying to make a point by nominating for deletion. –Fredddie ™ 19:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. Just because an article is well-sourced, does not automatically make it notable and historical. Gamweb (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging an article for deletion that was written by someone who tagged an article you worked on is disruptive to the encyclopedia. –Fredddie ™ 23:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Well-referenced and notable. older ≠ wiser 20:01, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and suggest closure per WP:SNOW—This county road predates the Michigan Highway System as the Marquette–Negaunee Road. When it was part of the state trunkline highway system, the first highway centerline in the United States (and the world) was painted along Dead Man's Curve. The site of this centerline is marked by a county historical marker, and it's eligible for inclusion on the State Register of Historic Sites and the National Register of Historic Places. The nominator of this AfD discussion is likely making a WP:POINT because I have nominated several Florida county roads for deletion or merger. Unlike this road, they do not have any significance outside of their counties, and even that significance is debatable. Imzadi 1979 → 22:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. You should also note that this AfD discussion does not reference any roads in Florida, or elsewhere. Gamweb (talk) 23:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging 3 articles (CR 492, H-58, H-63) worked on or created by one editor (Imzadi1979) when asked to comment on 3 AfDs (CR 509, CR 511, CR 516) that were opened by that same editor (Imzadi1979) is disruptive. and WP:POINTy. Imzadi 1979 → 23:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.