Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Radio Broadcasters, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Country Radio Broadcasters, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as reading like a news release since 9/08. Only sources found were press releases and absolutely nothing else except one sentence mentions such as "X won the Country Radio Broadcasters, Inc.'s Y award." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - Just mentioning that the Seminar was a separate Article until I merged it into here. There is possible Notability for the seminar if the "Largest" statement can be found, and thus the organization for creating/hosting it. I just don't care enough about Country Music to dig for it ;). Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 14:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The company commands lots of Googlehits, two of which are now added to the article. --Pink Bull 15:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. With the references that have been added, notability seems to have been established. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the updated article now appears to cross both the verifiability and notability thresholds. Clean-up may be called for but that's not a matter for AfD. - Dravecky (talk) 10:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.