Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Gold Weekend (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Country Gold Weekend

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom. Was prodded after the first AfD because Keller Broadcasting has gone under. Show no longer seems to exist, there is no longer a website, and because of its marginal notability when it did exist, I think it's time to delete this as well. Valfontis (talk) 00:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Based on the prod of Keller, my suspicion is that the ambitious Mr. Keller is out of the microbroadcasting business and doesn't want Keller or Country Gold around anymore. Since it was only barely notable through the good promotional talents of Mr. Keller, I don't see that it had the longevity or has any chance of becoming any more than a weakly justifiable article. tedder (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notability is not temporary. That the show has apparently gone defunct is not a valid reason for deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 23:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed- but my rationale was that it was barely notable to begin with, and now that there's no hope of further articles to be any more than weakly notable. Basically, there's no bright line. I'm not trying to convince you- just to explain my position. tedder (talk) 00:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability isn't temporary but it's got to be there in the first place before this matters. Notability isn't established here and the references dont demonstrate significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 02:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.