Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterfolk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 01:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Counterfolk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sub-sub-sub-genre of music, I can not find any real info about this and it seems to be just a local group of people trying to distinguish themselves from anti-folk. No real reliable sources on the web and google books only returned a few hits. Ridernyc (talk) 06:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did a pretty extensive search and found exactly the same as the nominator. All I could find were self published web pages by the one band. One band is not a genre.--SabreBD (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.