Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike equipment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Strike equipment[edit]

Clear violation of WP:NOT as information only useful in the successful execution of a video game. There is no value to this entry beyond the scope of being helpful in playing Counter-Strike. It's a game guide folks! Nick Y. 22:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete per nom. Isn't there some counterstrike wiki out there where all this cruft could go? Artw 22:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, although a very quick glance suggests they have equipment articles already. BryanG^(talk) 04:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Peta 00:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hargle 01:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NOR - everything in here is fan-written with absolutely no citations, due to the lack of notable, third-party sources for this information. JimmyBlackwing 01:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 02:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, maybe transwiki to Counter-Strike wiki on Wikia if there's anything they don't have already (a quick glance suggests they have all this, but I'm throwing in the plug anyway). BryanG^(talk) 04:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Gameguide. -- GWO
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_rants) 08:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline This seems to be one the game guide side of the game guide/encyclopedic coverage of gameplay line, but it could possibly be cleaned up. I'll hold off responding a few days to see if anyone does so. Ace of Sevens 08:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete game guide and WP:NOT for those. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.