Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count of banhous de Caeser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Count of banhous de Caeser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a supposed French noble family. While some of the names and terms used there, such Giuseppe Mifsud Bonnici and Bagnols-sur-Cèze check out, I could not find a single reference to Portelli-Banhous in either the English or French versions of Google or Google Books. No prejudice to withdrawing the AFD if sources for this are found, but as positively biased as I am toward historical topics, I think this might be a hoax or something the author (whose sole contribution is this article) simply made up. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As probable OR. Mifsud is apparently a very common name in Malta, but searching Google Books does bring up some references to a mid-18th century Giuseppe Mifsud. Likewise, Banhous is the Occitan name of Bagnols. It looks like personal genealogical research to me, especially with the lack of references, but I don't think it is a hoax. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Google search doesn't show up much. 173.13.150.22 (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete either a hoax or serious verifiability problems. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It could likely never be supported by reliable sources. If someone does find reliable sources, they can add the information to Wikipedia. James086 ^Talk 14:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.