Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa (Pante Macassar)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Costa (Pante Macassar)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single source does not support current information in article, just simply mentions that someplace of this name exists. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator in light of improvements by Mccapra.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment well the source says it’s a suco in Pante Macassar, which is what the article says. As a suco it must be legally recognized so appears to pass GEOLAND. I also found a snippet here. Mccapra (talk) 12:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the article is correct. I would agree, but I could find nothing to support that assertion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this report on “least developed sucos” [1] and this one on the 2017 parliamentary elections both discuss Costa as a suco. Mccapra (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.