Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corrupt Absolute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 08:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupt Absolute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines in WP:MUSIC, no significant charts or releases on notable labels. Also lacks coverage in secondary reliable sources. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Second relist, some discussion is needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are definitely references (and somewhat difficult to scare up, since they are under two different names) but they are all either small time or run of the mill coverage of "appearing this week at (venue name)" variety, consisting generally of band talking about themselves rather than objective, third party coverage. Could be worth saving if better examples of significant third party coverage could verify most of what it in this article, but best I can tell there is nothing new about them for over 10 years, and I suspect the band is defunct, having never really "made it" in any significant way. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shelby, and if bands insist on being clever and crafting names that make them pretty much indistinguishable from background clutter they deserve to fail the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.