Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpse Gatherer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Corpse Gatherer[edit]
- Corpse Gatherer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable monster with only one source shadzar|Talk|contribs 20:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. D&D monster appearing in only one book. Of no real significance in-game, and no evidence of third party coverage shown. J Milburn (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not every D&D creature is notable. Very few are, actually. This is no slaad or death knight, so away it goes. (I'm going to copy-paste this into all of the D&D creature AfD's going on right now. Couldn't we have combined them for ease?) --Ig8887 (talk) 03:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable fictional critter; try one line in a list, folks. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.