Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Affiliations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Affiliations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The only 3rd party sources here are one that discusses the parent company, LexisNexis, and a one line listing in a report. . DGG ( talk ) 23:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing significant or notable here, here, here and here to suggest this company is independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 18:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No secondary sources to establish nobility. CookieMonster755 (talk) 07:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No attempt made to be in compliance with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE The WSJ article does not actually mention Corporate Affiliations. The rest is all primary sources. In order for an article to be kept, we should expect at least some of the content to have strong sources, so there is some content worth keeping. CorporateM (Talk) 16:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Beating a dead horse here, but there simply are not any references that support notability. --TTTommy111 (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.