Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corner Bar Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 17:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corner Bar Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not show relevance. Poor sources. Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete There's no meaningful sourcing in the article. A Google search didn't find anything to support notability and https://www.cornerbarpictures.com/press didn't have anything in depth about the company. If someone can find the needed sourcing, I am willing to reconsider. Alansohn (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - sources are not really independent and of low quality. The company doesn't seem to have done anything substantial. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The editor added substantial international references. A Google search found the company as the first result. The editor added additional notability. My two cents - indie companies on the rise warrant the same respect as major studios. Youralamo (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Youralamo: - Would it be fair to say that your account is a Corner Bar Pictures WP:SPA? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 22:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~Comment Smallbones (smalltalk) I've read through the SPA page. I does appear that the content I am providing can be considered SPA. I've created entries for indie movies and indie music, which is my passion. However, I will broaden my entries. Thank you for the advice. Youralamo

@Youralamo: on my talk page you said "the page I created for Corner Bar Pictures" - you are the editor you are referencing in your comment, I presume? Please be forthright in discussions; it makes it a lot easier. You may need to look at WP:COI. (Also, for the record, I think the writing of the article, since you asked about it on my talk page, is for the most part fine, the problem is the subject just isn't really notable.) --Nerd1a4i (talk) 00:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~Comment Nerd1a4i (talk) You are correct, sir. I am the editor of the page in question. I read the entire COI page. I'm sorry if I was not forthright. I'm a newbie. Thank you for complimenting the writing of the article. I will work harder on the notability aspect. This company warrants an encyclopedia entry. I suppose did not effectively establish that yet. I appreciate the push to improve the page. Once I pass muster with this entry, I would like to add more indie film companies and indie music companies. Youralamo

~~Keep~~Comment Nerd1a4i (talk) Hi Nerd1a4i. I just added substantial notability and relevance to the entry and inserted more independent and higher quality sourcing and in-depth content. After reading through the Wikipedia Articles of deletion page, I found these 3 points, and responded to them for your consideration: 1). Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted. 2). If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. 3). If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article. Please have a look at your earliest convenience. I cited 16 reliable, reputable outside sources, such as EMMY nomination and IRISH FILM AND TELEVISION AWARD winning articles to establish notability. Both domestic and international press coverage of this company is now cited and of the highest caliber. Thank you sir. Please consider withdrawing the deletion notice and I will make you proud. Youralamo —Preceding undated comment added 16:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Youralamo: please stop saying "keep" over and over again. I don't think this company is notable enough to warrant an article. It has nothing to do with "making me proud", it's just wikipedia policy. It is up to the community; I won't retract my nomination. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, have struck out duplicate "keeps" and change them to "comments, hi Youralamo, i find this section of WP:AFD really useful, thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just read through the section you linked Coolabahapple. Thanks for sending. I appreciate the help. I suppose this newbie will bow out and let fate take over. I thought I had a really good first entry, especially after substantially beefing up the notability. Oh well, maybe next time. Nerd1a4i, if you can suggest a Disambiguation, Redirect, Merge or anything I missed instead of deletion, I am all ears. Thank you! Youralamo (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)youralamo[reply]

no probs Youralamo, you might like to have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film, it has some great info/links, also as they have over 150,000!! film related articles i'm sure the film project editors would appreciate any help regarding editing/cleaning up articles etc that you could do, happy editing:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 02:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.