Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corbin Carroll

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players. Those advocating for keeping the article haven't made their argument effectively. Merge content selectively, as needed to the target page. (non-admin closure) Steven Crossin 19:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corbin Carroll[edit]

Corbin Carroll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one statement in the article which might be notable, his .540 batting average in high school. The article doesn't even say he signed with MLB, only that he was drafted. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:38, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players. First round picks are notable and he should have an article. Malmmf (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one is a bit early to be included here.. i wish you would stop posting all these articles when they can be merged. If he signs with the Diamondbacks he should be merged to Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players and if he doesn't sign he should be redirected to List of Arizona Diamondbacks first-round draft picks. The results should be known soon. Spanneraol (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC) He signed today so should be merged. Spanneraol (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I only noticed them because their birthdates were added to the appropriate year article, which I have on watch. If headers on these articles were added so that people wouldn't do that, I would appreciate it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This is a notable player. He passes WP:GNG for being a MLB first round draft pick and for receiving a multi-million dollar contract. Also has notable achievements as a HS player. The sourcing is there to improve this rather stubby article. An editor needs to put the references in correct format and develop the articleTonereport ()(My Work) 00:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just being a 1st round pick and signing doesnt pass GNG.. baseball draft picks often flame out without making the majors. Spanneraol (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge He doesn't meet any criteria of WP:NBASEBALL and his coverage is exactly what you'd expect for a player drafted by Arizona and playing in the Arizona Rookie League. Fails to meet WP:GNG but redirects are cheap. WP:TOOSOON to claim he merits an individual article at this time. Papaursa (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.