Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copyright controversies of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew, no other delete votes. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright controversies of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unwieldy and completely unnecessary rehashing of information already found on the film's main article. Such a glut of information runs afoul of WP:UNDUE.~~ Withdrawn per SarekOfVulcan's explanation below. Seregain (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the consensus was to merge to the parent article. It was spun off per WP:SUMMARY back when it looked like there might be more to the issue. Over time, there was less there than met the eye, so it's appropriate to merge it back. As has been done. There's no pressing need to remove the article, and since material has been moved back and forth between the articles, it seems better to preserve both histories for copyright reasons. Guettarda (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep redirect, as info has been merged. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'd like to add that the article now has no major links to it anymore, which makes me question why it needs to be kept even as a redirect. Seregain (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP licensing pretty much requires that the history of the edits be maintained. If significant content was generated here before merging back to the original, we need to keep the redirect. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. I question the significance of the material, but I understand now. Thank you. I will withdraw the nomination. Seregain (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that makes this easy. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.