Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptosia gianassoi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdraw. It exists under a different name than what was on the article which I was not aware of. (non-admin closure) Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coptosia gianassoi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on 1 source, has no categories, and a google search on brings up about 100 results, most of which appear to be based off of Wikipedia or are UGC Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • a)
    A SCIENTIST HAS LEFT
    A DESCRIPTION MOST QUOTABLE
    OH FORTUNATE BUG
    WE DEEM THY NAME NOTABLE
    Burma-shave

(always happy to be able to use this :)

b) present in multiple databases as a synonym of Phytoecia gianassoi [1][2] (+ BioLib), to which name it should be moved (and lack of cats has never had any impact on AfD). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Original description: Sama, G. (2007). "Description of a new Coptosia fairmaire, 1864 from Iran (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Phytoeciini)". Atti della Società italiana di scienze naturali e del museo civico di storia naturale di Milano. 148 (1): 97–100.
Reclassification: Danilevsky, M. L. (2017). "A new subgenus of the longicorn genus Phytoecia Dejean, 1835 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from the Palaearctic region". Entomological Review. 97 (8): 1137–1139.
So what I'm saying is - withdraw? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. I was not aware of the synonym as I only did a google search on the article name, not aware there was another name. I will actually move the article to the appropriate name after withdrawing. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 13:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.