Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooraclare
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was The result was nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cooraclare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is pure nonsense Sarah777 (talk) 23:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Somebody has cleaned it up leaving very little - but it doesn't require deletion anymore. Can I withdraw an AfD? Sarah777 (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mild keep. I have rewritten for grammar and style. docboat (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: by long consensus, named geographical locations fall within a per se rule. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per nominator withdrawal. Additionally, I don't think anyone will disagree with Smerdis of Tlön's point above; named geographical locations are inherently notable (as long as they aren't hoaxes, which a Google search rules out in this case). AnturiaethwrTalk 16:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.