Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooks Hill, New South Wales
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW - Peripitus (Talk) 02:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cooks Hill, New South Wales[edit]
- Cooks Hill, New South Wales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Basically self Promotion of a town in New South Wales. Magistrand My Talk 15:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per precedent, places are inherently notable. Clean the article up if it is needed. Nuttah68 15:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Article may need a bit of a rewrite, but places are inherently notable. -- Chairman S. Talk Contribs 21:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Suburb of Newcastle, New South Wales. Needs a clean up including wikifying but this Newcastle City Council webpage confirms that it is a real place see [1].
Capitalistroadster 01:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean up, as usual.--Grahamec 03:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above. QazPlm 03:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all above. --Oakshade 04:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, pointless AfD. -- Chuq 06:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, per Nuttah68/Chairman S. Daniel.Bryant 11:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep gazetted geographical location, therefore notable. Needs some cleanup is all.--Canley 13:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, I don't often vote Speedy Keep, but there is loads of precedent for having articles on actual real suburbs and towns. Lankiveil 12:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.