Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cook County Board of Review 1st district

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cook County Board of Review. The "keep" opinions amount to "these districts are big", which does not address the reasons for deletion. Any relevant and sourceable content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 19:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cook County Board of Review 1st district

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominated:

These are electoral districts for a county's property assessment review board. Electoral districts fail WP:NGEO, especially when used to divide voters only for special-purpose districts of local government, because those districts are not "populated, legally recognized places" (WP:GEOLAND). Edge3 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Edge3 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Edge3 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, maybe partial merge. Cook County Board of Review is absolutely not significant enough for its individual districts to have articles. While the same user created substantial articles for the recent officeholders, a few feel like refbombs for NPOL failures; even as big as Cook County is it's hard to say that it's notable to be the one who judges local property tax assessments. Reywas92^Talk 00:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cook County is home to 5,275,541 people. Each of the three districts of the commission has about 1,750,000 constituents. That's a much greater number of constituents than occupy most constituencies given articles on Wikipeida. At least merge this information if not keep this article. SecretName101 (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with merging to the Board of Review article, and that's my fault for not considering merger as an alternative to deletion. I still contend that the districts themselves are not notable because electoral districts for local governments generally have not been the subject of significant coverage. Edge3 (talk) 03:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as these electoral districts have very large electorates.Jackattack1597 (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to Cook County Board of Review.4meter4 (talk) 04:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.