Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CookXml

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CookXml[edit]

CookXml (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth independent reliable sources located. Ineligible for PROD as it was PRODded in 2006 and removed by the article creator. ♠PMC(talk) 06:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 06:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 06:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The project was created in 2006, but wound off in 2008; received minor updates until 2013. Its forum has closed down shortly after that because of receiving nothing but spam. Now, the question is: did it make an impact? And the answer is no. Google News has nothing. Google Books has a lot of false positives. The top seven items have "Source Wikipedia" tags. (Ouch!) It has a Softpedia page but it has not been reviewed. So, the verdict is: No impact. Cheers. Flowing dreams (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I cant find anything either. Mccapra (talk) 03:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 13:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.