Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convergence for Friuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sergio Cecotti. Choosing to Merge as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Convergence for Friuli[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A local party that existed (presumably) for a short time, but which does not meet WP:GNG. Apart from some rare mention on articles referring to personalities who were part of it (and not to the party itself), I found only a couple of sources on this party, the first source ([1]) refers to its foundation, the second source ([2]) refers to the substantial absence of this party on the territory and in the press. I can imagine replies like that the sources have disappeared because a few years have passed and that every little piece of political history deserves to have an article on Wikipedia, but I already reply that if notability cannot be proved it cannot be assumed, and that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 18:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Wikipedia is great especially when it gathers information that would be difficult to find anywhere else. This said, there are more than 1,000 Google hits on this party, meaning that it had significant news coverage, and it was represented in the Regional Council of Friuli-Venezia Giulia. If there is no consensus on keeping the article, it could be merged into Sergio Cecotti. --Checco (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google hits prove nothing, especially in cases like this... Surely it would be more logical to merge it with Sergio Ceccotti, since it was his personal party.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 13:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 19:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources found for this party. What's given in the article isn't much for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 19:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NORG criteria for establishing notability, not finding any sourcing that meets the criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.