Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convalescence EP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 7 Horns 7 Eyes. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Convalescence EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Do not satisfy WP:MUSIC guidelines. The article admits this was just a sampler for an album, Throes of Absolution, which I am also nominating for deletion. Another release by this band (7 Horns 7 Eyes (Self-titled EP)) has already been deleted as non-notable, but mysteriously recreated. Emeraude (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Throes of Absolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
7 Horns 7 Eyes (Self-titled EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge and Redirect All to 7 Horns 7 Eyes. I couldn't find sources other than fan-made metal blogs. ~EdGl! 15:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Speedy delete 7 Horns 7 Eyes (Self-titled EP) as G4 recreation. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep I found all references to all three articles, and i could find more, therefore i think that they should stay
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep All the references i found were from Allmusic.com They are all reliable sources. And This band is going to have 3 possible releases and will need pages for them. So They should probably stay. Metalworker14 (Yo) 9:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Note that the 2 "keep" !votes above were made by the same user. A listing on AllMusic doesn't make an album automatically notable. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All that the Allmusic pages do is confirm the existence of the albums. That is of no use to us whatsoever - the question is not do the albums exist but whether or not they are notable. It is worth observing though, that the amount of use these Allmusic pages have had is minimal, which in itself suggests they are not notable. Emeraude (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that most delete accusations were all put on by the same user. I will look for more references anyway. Metalworker14 (Yo) 12:52, 25 March, 2015 (UTC)
The above is so untrue as to amount to a deliberate lie! No one has made more than a single delete !vote; ALL keep votes have been by one person. Emeraude (talk) 11:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.