Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contently (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contently

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly notable, but this is fundamentally an advertisement, and the promotional tone is so pervasive that it does not seem fixable. NOT ADVOCACY is one of our basic principles--we shouldn't concern ourselves whether or not the advertisement is of a potentially notable firm or product. DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promotional 'cruft on a company that's not yet achieved anything of note. Sources are WP:SPIP / fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not a free means of promoting the company's "Press" and "Leadership". K.e.coffman (talk) 05:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. MER-C 12:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.