Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitutional congress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted per author's request (blanking the page). Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Constitutional congress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Written as an essay; the userpage version is already being discussed for deletion. Ironholds 00:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per the writer of the articles request. I was trying to delete the content and blank the page and reverted the page to have the deletion notice and to request continuation of deletion. And was given final warning to be blocked in the process. How can I get the warning removed as my intention was not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Constitutional congress (talk • contribs) 03:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --KurtRaschke (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure original research. J.delanoygabsanalyze 01:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NPOV and WP:OR violation. (Frankly, I think it's speediable, as patent nonsense.) --Orange Mike | Talk 01:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The user involved is getting slightly cranky about it; i wanted to put it through AFD to get some editor consensus to convince him to quiten down, instead he's complaining i'm "harrassing" him and threatening admin action. Not one of my better ideas. Ironholds 01:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an essay or OR or NPOV your choice. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 02:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No real content besides, as nom says, criticizing the U.S. Congress; major NPOV problems -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 02:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Tagged for speedy as nonsense. ukexpat (talk) 03:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete The other editors said it best (and earlier)! Ecoleetage (talk) 03:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.