Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consett magazine
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak under criterion A7. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 11:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Consett magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam creation for NN local advertising magazine available in one local supermarket Travelbird (talk) 02:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - New publication, non-notable and unreferenced. Seems purely promotional. - MrX 03:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: No indication of notability whatsoever, and I can't find any significant coverage on Google. Tagged under A7 criteria. Lugia2453 (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, regardless of its influx of traffic and syndication with the Google News. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MEDIA. §FreeRangeFrog 05:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.