Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscious Robots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conscious Robots[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book of popular philosophy from an unknown publisher. Peter Ells (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 10. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 21:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Certainly not finding enough to pass GNG or NBOOK. Also Think Ink who printed it is a self-publisher. The imprint, fittingly named "Peacock's Tail Publishing," doesn't seem to return any immediately discernible Google hits unrelated to this book, which is strange (but irrelevant to this discussion, I suppose). --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.