Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest Games Convention
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Conquest Games Convention[edit]
- Conquest Games Convention (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Game convention of unclear notability. Article is unreferenced since 2006 and I am unable to find significant coverage in third party sources. Google search for "Conquest Games Convention"-wikipedia results in mostly Wikipedia scrapers and some bulletin board postings. Prod was contested. ... discospinster talk 03:15, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. no significant reliable coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.